Amendment 62

Personhood

Thank you to the blue book alternative. Blatant false information in Colorado’s official, though biased, 2010 Blue Book voter guide includes this outright lie from Planned Parenthood and the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) that, “Amendment 62 may also limit… treatment for miscarriages,” which is false because in a miscarriage, tragically, the baby has already died. The Blue Book also falsely claims, against all scientific and medical research and common usage of English grammar, that the phrase “the beginning of biological development,” is “a term which is not defined… and is not an accepted medical or scientific term.” Extensive medical and scientific documentation for the beginning of biological development appears at ColoradoRTL.org/beginning.

AMENDMENT 62 TEXT: The 2010 Personhood Amendment adds the following section to the Colorado constitution’s Bill of Rights:

Section 32. Person defined. As used in sections 3, 6, and 25 of Article II of the state constitution, the term “person” shall apply to every human being from the beginning of the biological development of that human being.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST: See below.

ARGUMENTS FOR: Persons not Property: Passing Amendment 62 will mean that: “. . . the term ‘person’ shall apply to every 
human being from the beginning of the biological 
development of that human being.” (actual wording)

Snowflake Children: This baby girl was adopted, like all the snowflake kids, as a frozen embryo. A snowflake child is one of the strongest proofs that the single-celled human is a person. Little Elisha Lancaster, frozen for years, appears in an online Amendment 62 video with her mom Maria. Elisha was fully alive, fully human, and not a boy but already a little girl, at the very moment that she came into existence in a laboratory. Then, four years later, this tiny person was adopted, Federal Expressed across the country, and implanted in mom’s womb.

Will the Personhood Amendment Stop Abortion? Our law prohibits the intentional killing of an innocent person. So yes, the illegality and unconstitutionality of abortion will finally be evident. What about Roe? See Dred and Roe v. Wade below.

Isn’t It Part of the Woman’s Body? Half the time the fetus is a boy. 
Always the mother is female. Her son’s Y chromosome 
cannot be part of mom. He’s a genetically distinct individual. And whether it’s a baby boy or girl, the baby is not the woman’s body, but has his or her own body within mom. The unborn 
baby’s first cry for food is actually a pheromone signal, from one organism to another. A hormone is a chemical signal 
between organs within an organism, but the baby’s request is a human pheromone. So while still traveling toward the womb, the fetal cry lets mom know the baby’s already hungry!

Would a Mother Be Arrested for Miscarriage? That claim is pure fear mongering. History demonstrates the truth. When the nation recognized abortion as illegal, the authorities never arrested a single doctor or woman for a miscarriage.

Should Eggs Have Rights? Those who kill unborn children try to 
dehumanize them by referring to the youngest ones as “eggs.” Confusing an egg with an organism is biological and moral 
ignorance. The Carnegie Institute’s world-renowned Stages of Early Human Developmentlists terms with “no scientific 
usefulness” and says that “the term ‘egg’ is best reserved for… the breakfast table.” Immoral terms like gooks and fertilized egg dehumanize other people to make it easier to kill them.

Won’t This Outlaw Contraceptives? No, recognizing personhood has no effect on contraceptives that only 
prevent fertilization. However, personhood would 
prohibit any chemical abortifacient that kills the tiniest boys and girls. When the abortion industry says that personhood would 
outlaw contraceptives, they’re either lying now, or they were lying then, for they’ve spent decades telling women that such chemicals did not kill a living embryo. Women should know whether or not a chemical would abort their children. 
Personhood Amendment 62 will end these lies.

Where Do Rights Come From? Human rights do not come from the government, for then they wouldn’t be rights; nor from the majority (consider America and slaves, Germany and Jews); nor from the doctor or hospital. For rights come from our Creator, at that moment we are created, as Jeremiah 1:5 quotes God, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you.” The Declaration of Independence affirms what those who believe in God have always known. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they areendowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life…” We have human rights because we are made in our Creator’s image and likeness, which is why parents, unlike animals, have a moral obligation to protect and love our children, born and unborn.

Won’t Personhood Hurt Rape and Incest Victims? Consider the horror of abortion for incest. Cruelly, the abortion clinic typically covers up the crime of incest by sending the victim back home to her rapist. Even worse, they often send her home with her rapist, the very criminal who impregnated her and then brought her to Planned Parenthood. Abortion for incest 
emboldens a criminal to rape his young relative; helps him 
escape being caught; tempts him to repeat his crime; and 
is not compassionate because it kills a baby, fuels rape, 
and increases the woman’s suffering. Personhood for the unborn helps people understand that there are no hard cases when deciding to love a baby. You don’t kill a child because her 
father is a criminal. As documented by Live Action Film’s 
Lila Rose and by Life Dynamics’ Caught on Tape, 
abortion clinics in Colorado and nationwide routinely 
refuse to comply with mandatory reporting laws for 
suspected child rape.

What About the Life of the Mother? The personhood campaign cares as much for the mom as for the baby, so why no “life” exception? The doctor’s goal should be to save mom and the baby, if possible, but never to kill the mother to save the baby, nor to kill the child to save the mother. With a tubal pregnancy for 
example we cannot save the child and we must remove the 
embryo to save the mother. Sadly then the baby dies. Society’s attempt to justify killing the unborn leads to absurdities like 
the exception in the partial birth abortion ban. In reality, when a 
delivery is needed to save mom, the doctor shouldn’t stop 
caring for the mother just long enough to kill the baby. 
The PBA ban itself has no authority to save a single 
child because the abortionist simply uses a variation of PBA or 
some other late-term technique to kill the baby. However, 
the very idea of delaying the saving of a mom in order to 
stop midway to kill the baby is such an obvious cruelty and 
deception that it exposes the hard-heartedness of those who argue for such exceptions. An “exception” is 
a euphemism for deliberately killing a baby. That’s why personhood is changing what it means to be pro-life.

Every Snowflake: Love and law should protect every 
embryo, even frozen ones like he was…

Science, Right and Wrong: The laws of the physical 
sciences do not even use the words right and wrong. On the other hand, the laws of logic, justice and reason are not physical (they have no shape, no mass, no polarity, etc.) so there is a non-physical reality of justice and
reason. So moral relativism does not have scientific support. And the humanist clichés that masquerade as science are easily rebutted:

  • There is no truth! Rebuttal: Is that true?
  • There are no absolutes! Rebuttal: Absolutely?
  • Only your five senses provide real knowledge.
    Rebuttal: Says which of the five?
  • Only the physical realm is real!

Rebuttal: That claim itself is not physical.

Albert Einstein, in the book Out of My Later Years, wrote that, “Science can only ascertain what is, but not what should be,” necessarily excluding from its domain “value judgments of all kinds.” Thus science could not even prove that the Holocaust or slavery were wrong. Our understanding of right and wrong flows from the Creator who gave us the right to life!

Dred and Roe v. Wade: The failed approach for 37 years to get the U.S. Supreme Court to right its own wrong and reverse 
Roe v. Wade is not surprising. Why not? Because the Justices have referred to their 150-year old pro-slavery Dred Scott decision 56 times without the court ever admitting to the illegitimacy of that ruling’s crime against millions of people. And ‘pro-life’ presidents say they ignore abortion when nominating judges, who serve for life. The court might not reverse itself for centuries. But Roe itself says that if “personhood is established, [abortion] collapses.” Yet some think it’s “the wrong time” because the Court is not ready to admit the illegitimacy of its abortion ruling. But after a war, a constitutional amendment, and abolition, the Supreme Court still has not acknowledged its illegitimacy for denying full personhood rights of black slaves. Abolitionist William Wilberforce would never have opposed those fighting for abolition and he urged the U.S. to fight to end, rather than to regulate, slavery. It’s never the wrong time to do the right thing.

Fetus Recognized as a Child from the Beginning: 3,500 years ago the Mosaic Law in the Bible recognized the 
unborn child as a person (ColoradoRTL.org/Bible). 2,400 years ago the “father of medicine” wrote in the Hippocratic Oath, “I will not… cause an abortion.” Moms have always talked about the “baby” in their womb. And throughout history the child’s amazing development has been known through miscarriage (which is tragic but a natural death, as contrasted with abortion which is deliberate murder). And today 4D 
ultrasound shows for all to see what has always been known, the 
precious humanity of the child in the womb.  Abortion is wrong 
because it’s a baby; it’s always wrong to intentionally kill a baby.
  So please vote YES on 62!

FIND OUT MORE: At C-SPAN.com you can find more answers to Planned Parenthood’s arguments against the unborn child. Just search for personhood amendment.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST: Researchers discovered that the Amendment 62 opponent, Protect Families Protect Choices, is actually run by Colorado’s largest abortion chain, Planned Parenthood, and that their general counsel Kevin Paul testified at the Committee on Legislative Council’s Blue Book public hearing. Planned Parenthood cannot be trusted. Planned Parenthood has a billion-dollar financial stake in killing unborn children, and personhood will put them out of business. Abortion clinics in Colorado alone kill enough people each year to fill the Pepsi Center.

Pepsi Center Cost in Human Life

Colorado abortion mills kill enough people each year to fill the Pepsi Center.

Further, Planned Parenthood still celebrates their founder Margaret Sanger who described the handicapped as the “blind, deaf, dumb, mute and epileptics… this dead weight of human waste.” Many abortion defenders are in denial that Planned Parenthood’s longtime president would write these words, and experience shows that many refuse to simply click over to Google Books where they can see for themselves this cruel statement in context on page 112 in a scanned copy of her book Pivot of Civilization . Even worse though, Sanger, who is still honored through Planned Parenthood’s giving of the annual Margaret Sanger Award, wrote on page 33 of her book Woman and the New Race of babies AFTER THEY ARE BORN, that, The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.


Amendment 62 Co-Sponsors

Colorado Right To Life
1535 Grant Street #303
Denver, CO 80203
303-753-9394
ColoradoRTL.org

Personhood Colorado
PO Box 486
Arvada, CO 80001
303-456-2800
PersonhoodColorado.com

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: